Author: Alex Lawson

Alex Lawson is Housing Policy Manager for CNY Fair Housing. CNY Fair Housing is a private, non-profit organization founded in 1991, dedicated to eliminating housing discrimination, promoting open communities, and ensuring equal access to housing opportunities for all people in Central and Northern New York.

CNY Fair Housing Guest Article

Exclusionary zoning regulations contribute to Onondaga County’s housing crisis by restricting the number and variety of homes available in our community. Too many people are stuck in housing they can’t afford and that does not meet their needs because the 34 different municipal zoning codes that govern the construction of housing in Onondaga County make it difficult to build any kind of housing except for detached single-unit houses on large lots. We need zoning reform to allow the construction of more diverse and more affordable types of housing in neighborhoods across the community.

The City of Syracuse adopted Onondaga County’s first municipal zoning law in 1922 in response to discriminatory fears about the “infiltration” of Black and Immigrant families into middle and upper class neighborhoods. That law banned multifamily housing from new neighborhoods in an effort to entrench the City’s existing residential segregation, and it worked. Even 100 years later, city neighborhoods built after the 1922 zoning ordinance was passed tend to be whiter and wealthier than more diverse pre-zoning neighborhoods. (you can read more about this history in CNY Fair Housing’s report, Zoning and Segregation in Syracuse, NY)

Since 1922, every village and town in Onondaga County (except the Town of Otisco) has followed in Syracuse’s footsteps by adopting its own unique zoning code. Taken together, these 34 municipal laws regulate what can be built on 95% of all land in the county, and they severely restrict the amount and diversity of housing that can be built in the vast majority of neighborhoods in our community. On almost three quarters of all land zoned for residential use, the only type of housing allowed is a single-unit, detached house. Even where other types of housing—such as apartments, townhouses, and duplexes—are technically allowed, they are subject to discretionary reviews that push up costs by adding delays and uncertainty to the homebuilding process. Zoning allows the construction of a new apartment building without all of this added red tape on just 3% of residential land in the county and just 1% of residential land outside of Syracuse. (you can read more about these statistics and see maps of every zoning ordinance in the County in CNY Fair Housing’s report, Exclusionary Zoning in Onondaga County).

These restrictions push up housing costs and perpetuate segregation in two ways. First, they make it so difficult and expensive to build new housing that not enough gets built. Over the last several years, both rent and sale prices for housing have skyrocketed in Onondaga County as a growing number of households has competed for too few homes. Vacancy rates, availability, and the number of days homes and apartments stay on the market have all dropped as prices have soared. Housing prices are going up because there simply are not enough homes, and zoning stands in the way of building more of the housing we need.

Second, exclusionary zoning does not allow enough housing diversity. In too many neighborhoods it is impossible to build much of anything besides detached single unit houses on large lots, and that kind of housing just doesn’t work for everybody. Family sizes are getting smaller, the county’s population is aging, young people are putting off home purchases later, and big expensive houses with lots of bedrooms and stairs aren’t really a one-size-fits-all solution for our increasingly diverse community. More neighborhoods need more housing diversity—including apartments, townhouses, small starter homes, duplexes, and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)—in order to meet our community’s evolving housing needs.

Some Onondaga County municipalities are pointing the way towards effective zoning reform. The City of Syracuse passed a complete overhaul of its zoning code last year that allowed townhouses and ADUs in areas that had previously been restricted to single-unit development. The City’s new zoning ordinance also requires larger apartment complexes to set aside some units for households that earn below the Area Median Income. In July, the Town of Salina created a special zoning district to allow the Northern Lights Plaza to be redeveloped as a mixed-use district including apartment homes. In August, the Town of Manlius legalized ADUs to allow existing homeowners to help create more housing in the town.

Zoning laws shape growth, and Onondaga County is poised to start growing for the first time in decades. If we want to grow into a more equitable, sustainable, and diverse community, we will need to reform our zoning laws to make that possible.

Share

Innovation in Action: Data Dating

City highways and lights.

The world of dating has been forever-changed by the Internet. Applications such as Tinder, Bumble and Hinge have allowed for individuals separated by time and space to connect based upon shared interests, without ever needing to meet one another face to face. For better or for worse, this has led to an unprecedented level of digital connectivity unlike the world has seen before.

But what if this new technology could be used for a different purpose—for the betterment of communities, outside of pixilated messages and swipes? For Dr. Frank Ridzi, vice president, community investment at the Central New York Community Foundation, the idea wasn’t so farfetched.

Ridzi is a lover of data. He thrives on the excitement of recognizing trends between nonprofit groups in the Central New York community, and using data to allocate aid accordingly. Utilizing the Life Needs Assessment, a survey offered to various non-profits in the area, Ridzi pioneered the concept of “Data Dating.”

The Life Needs Assessment is quite simple; surveyed respondents answer succinct, straightforward questions such as “Do you have dependable and safe transportation when you need it,” and “Do you have long-term housing that you can afford.” Respondents are also asked to provide basic, demographic information on age, race, and neighborhood, among others, to analyze which communities are in need of certain resources.

The most crucial aspect of the survey is that it is completely confidential. Anyone who is served by a nonprofit organization has the opportunity to take the survey. Privacy is integral to data gathering, and the assessment never shares names in the process to protect respondents.

Similar in the way dating apps match users with one another based upon common interests, data dating uses survey responses to pair different nonprofits with one another based upon their clients’ needs and strengths. In all aspects of their operations, where one organization flourishes, another may struggle. Data Dating allows for different organizations to connect based upon mutually beneficial partnerships, and ultimately leads to better services for the communities the nonprofits represent.

PEACE, Inc. used Data Dating resources to partner with organizations that have similar missions to further enhance its work. Todd Goehle, community engagement director at PEACE, Inc., cited the importance of holistic data collection and collaboration with other organizations.

“The data that we’re accumulating doesn’t necessarily reflect the community at large,” he said. “This tool gives us opportunities, especially with live mapping, to identify locations where interventions can be made.”

The survey allows organizations to combine both qualitative and quantitative data to paint a better picture of the needs in communities. For example, during the onset of COVID-19, there was a common narrative that the most need-based resource was food. However, it became clear through surveyed respondents that there was a greater need for things like jobs, assistance paying bills, computers and internet connectivity. This data made it easier for organizations to identify the areas that needed attention and quickly shift resources to address them.

Pairing nonprofits together in order to more efficiently and effectively achieve their goals is the first step in creating a better quality of life for Central New York residents. Not only does the method of Data Dating facilitate a culture of partnership, but it ensures resources are allocated in an equitable and impactful way

 

Share